The things we do to survive difficult times are truly
surprising. Wilderness survival has
become a staple on Netflix and YouTube, with shows like Man Tracker being
popular. But the ancient Hebrews,
wandering around in the wilderness, didn’t have encyclopedias to tell them how
to survive, or what to eat. They didn’t
have an app on their phone pointing to where the nearest grocery store was, and
they certainly couldn’t skip the dishes!
Survival was not something they could take for granted. So when snakes moved in to their campground,
no wonder they were upset. They couldn’t
contact Fish and Wildlife and rent a snake trap to deal with the infestation.
They did have a clear understanding that their choices had
led to their misfortunes. Their decision
to be negative, to complain repeatedly about the food like a bunch of teenagers
in the school cafeteria, was very human.
There are at least 14 instances in the books of Exodus and Numbers, of
the people complaining about the food or the water, like a broken record that
went on and on. Despite everything Moses
did, finding rocks with water in it, or manna on the ground, or quails in the
air, the people still complained.
Slavery where they had no choices and they knew what would happen every
day of their lives, was better than the unpredictable never-ending hiking trip
that left them all tired and grumpy at the end of every day. Freedom is not as wonderful as they thought
it would be. They were still part of the
slavery mindset where it was always someone else’s fault. They were addicted to seeing only the
negative in every situation. Surprisingly,
snakes are supposed to be better protein than beef, and according to one
website, rattlesnake meat is particularly delicious. And since Moses hadn’t gotten time to write
down what was clean and what was unclean yet in the book of Leviticus, snakes
could have been a real boost to their diets.
At least, if you don’t eat the poison glands in the heads, and don’t get
bitten as you try to catch them. Maybe
Moses or the writers of Leviticus knew something about those snakes we don’t.
Whatever the reason, God and Moses cooked up some art
therapy for the Hebrews to get them looking up.
They cooked up a snake on a stick, to remind the folks that they had
someone to trust in that was more powerful than snakes. To remind the folks to go to prayer first,
not negativity. To break their slave
thinking which assumed the worst in all situations. To put God right in the centre of all their
calamities and fears and frustrations.
Jesus continued that metaphor and built on it in a
night-time conversation with Nicodemus.
Nicodemus, an educated believer, was an expert in the bible. He wanted to figure out if Jesus was
legitimate or just a con man, if Jesus was rooted and grounded in his
scriptures or just inventing whatever he felt like. This was a test of Jesus and his theology by
a temple official. This was not a casual
chat about whether or not snakes might be edible, a conversation that was light
and fluffy between two strangers wondering if they might be able to become
friends. This was the meeting of two
great minds to talk about deep philosophical stuff. Jesus could throw obscure quotes from the
bible at Nicodemus because Jesus had studied it well. Nicodemus would have been impressed that
Jesus knew that odd story, and he would have taken it as a sign that Jesus had
done his homework. From the questions
Nicodemus asked Jesus, he was honestly open and curious as to what Jesus was
teaching, and was listening hard to understand.
That teaching was surprising on so many levels. We tend to focus mostly on John 3:16 because
that has become the most famous passage of the bible, seen at football games
and on billboards. It also has become
interpreted in toxic ways. One person
described John 3:16 as a “believe it or else” warning sign used to divide and
discriminate against people that don’t believe in Jesus in just the right
way. Which is ironic, because Nicodemus
came with questions and an attitude of curiosity. Jesus treated him with deep respect, engaging
his questions, inspiring deeper questions, and having a rich, metaphorical
conversation. If Nicodemus were here
today, would he read John 3:16 as an invitation to deeper conversations or as a
condemnation of himself as not doing Christianity right? Would the people he talked to today condemn
him for not understanding, or encourage him to keep questioning? It’s too bad that we stop at 3:16, because
3:17 is in my mind a much more invitational and hopeful verse. Jesus came into the world not to condemn the
world but that the whole world might be saved.
In some ways, that is the true scandal of this passage. Our secret deeds will no longer be secret,
our actions that we’re not proud of, these will be as evident and as prominent
as if we had put them on a stick and marched them in a parade in the downtown
on Canada Day. But the whole world will
be saved not only from our faults and mistakes and secrets, but from all that
has us feeling scared or angry. The
whole world. Not just the pretty ones,
the famous ones, the straight ones, the rich ones, the powerful ones, but the
whole world.
The whole world includes people of all ages, races,
ethnicity, abilities, sexual orientation, gender identity, and family
structure. It also includes creation,
snakes and all. Jesus didn’t condemn
Nicodemus, who helped care for his body on Good Friday. Jesus came for all of us, in all our glorious
diversity. Whether we are campers who
like our microwaves, or survivalists who want to know how to cook the snakes
that are edible, we are part of the world that Jesus came to be lifted up for. May we find courage and strength no matter
where we find ourselves or what we are struggling with, by keeping our eyes on
Jesus. Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment